🔗 Share this article

The beluga known as Jelly Bean’s daughter Bertie Botts is an adorable small “playful character”. Orion – nicknamed “Onion Ring” – is a large but fiercely protective friend. Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and wiggles like a wiggly creature. Lillooet the beluga is the “loving presence” with a kind nature.

A group of thirty enclosed beluga whales in a Canadian amusement park have become pawns in a struggle between a shuttered park, local and national governments and animal rights activists.

But those working directly with the whales say the intense debate over their fate often overlooks the complexities of the whales who, after living their entire lives in enclosed habitats, have been thoroughly researched by the humans who work with them regularly.

After the Canadian government disallowed the export of the belugas to a foreign facility, the embattled attraction near Niagara Falls where they are held stated it would consider to euthanize them unless the government funds the expense of their care. The nation’s marine resources official has denied that demand, placing the 30 whales in an dangerously unstable situation.

Intelligent Marine Mammals

Researchers say that beluga whales’ neuroanatomy, along with their mimicry abilities, problem solving and communal behavior point to they are remarkably smart animals – something a former trainer learned directly.

She spent three years as a whale caretaker, a role that involved gaining confidence of the aquatic animals.

“Developing those connections over time takes a lot of regularity and a lot of care. At the outset, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “Over time, you gain shared confidence. And they start being more open with you. It’s just so extraordinary and rewarding.”

Burgess knew the whales were very smart, but she says she was nevertheless amazed by the nuances and unique traits in their characters. She cultivated a particular love for a pair of whales with contrasting temperaments.

“Eve accepted me. The other demanded work,” she said. “Each changed the way I view relationships.”

Public Concerns and Facility Decline

Burgess’s interaction with the whales evolved against a context of growing public opposition to their enclosure.

During her three years at the park, multiple belugas and the park’s single killer whale, the orca, died. In all, nineteen belugas have perished at the park since recent years, a number which the facility ascribes to natural mortality, but which activists say indicates the substandard environment in which they were kept.

The park did not operate to the guests over the recent season, but Burgess says she observed directly results of the cessation. “Concrete is falling apart from the enclosures because they’re degrading and not being maintained. The whales are exploratory and so they pick it up and navigate with chunks in their mouth. It’s distressing to see.”

The park did not comment to a request for comment, but in the past asserted: “The whales … receive far better veterinary services and around the clock care than any individual in the United Kingdom, or other places.”

Uncertain Future and Potential Resolutions

The former employee was fired from the park in early March following the death of Eos, an ailing beluga the caretakers had to humanely kill. She said the park thought particulars of the incident were shared to the press and she was fired not long after.

The ambiguity over the whales’ outcome has left her and staff members in distress. She says the facility’s threat to end the lives of its whales is a bargaining chip and is a “practically unfeasible” task, adding any attempts to euthanize even a individual beluga would require “immense manpower”, equipment and heavy equipment.

“It cannot happen in hell the staff would ever do it,” she said.

She advocates for demands for the whales to be taken immediately from the park, with its deteriorating pools and reduced personnel.

In the autumn, Canada’s government official rejected a request to send the whales to an overseas location.

“To approve the application would have meant a continued situation in enclosure and a reversion to public entertainment,” the minister commented. “As Canadians, we know that belugas are meant for the ocean, not in enclosures for our amusement. I could not in good conscience approve an transfer that would prolong the treatment these belugas have suffered.”

But the former trainer said the minister’s remarks reveal a more general incorrect perception of the circumstances of living conditions for belugas raised in confinement.

“The public needs to grasp these are whales that have spent their whole lives in captivity and they will need constant supervision for the foreseeable future,” she said. “People just don’t realize that it’s not as easy as saying ‘end operations’.”

Alternative Habitat and Continuing Discussion

As decision makers work to find a answer, ideas have emerged, some of which have minimal feasibility. An idea called for the belugas to be freed into the open waters of the Arctic – where whales are a key source of food for local populations.

A proposed refuge in the region of Nova Scotia, which now received government approval, has proven contentious. The prospective site, which includes a large area of protected cove, is not yet built. Supporters remain positive that it could in time represent a sustainable solution for a number of the whales.

But, the former trainer says, among trainers she’s consulted, there is “skepticism there” about what she said is “merely an untested concept” in the whales’ fate.

Some experts say the prospect of a refuge represents a worldwide trend away from animal displays and could represent a viable plan in the short term.

The project lead, leader of the plan, said the location will simulate the mental engagement and nutrition the whales get from specialists, albeit in a much larger area. He said after the health of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|